HUMANOID EXPERT TALK
Why “Safe Stop” fails and what replaces it.
With Dr.-Ing. Florian Weißhardt and Dr.-Ing. Tim Fröhlich (Synapticon).
Safety transitions can destabilize a humanoid.
Cut torque at the wrong moment and you create instability — not protection.
Deterministic multi-axis control
Hard real-time guarantees across 50+ DoF
Volumetric safety modeling
Dynamic 3D fall-zone awareness
AI behavior supervision
Constraining non-deterministic decisions
System-level integration
Drives, perception and safety as one architecture
WHAT YOU WILL GAIN
A System Blueprint
What must remain deterministic and why.
An architecture model
How motion, supervision and safety layers interact.
A transition strategy
Designing safe torque reduction.
A deployment checklist
From demo to real-world operation.
BUILT FOR HUMANOID SYSTEM OWNERS
This session is designed for anyone who defines system-level architecture decisions.
- CTO
- Head of Robotics
- Chief Engineer
- Controls Lead
- Safety & Architecture Owner
Humanoid safety is not a feature decision. It is an architecture decision.
